According to sources from the
Municipal Expertise Center, the Center had bridged a gap in the judicial
expertise by building a judicial expertise experts base through their 5 yeas
pains-taking efforts. The base is composed of 144 authoritative persons from
different branches of knowledge including four experts committee covering
physical injury, mental diseases, wording authentication, and judicial account
verification. The scientific and objective expertise conclusions made by
those¡°Watsons of different sciences¡±ensure the just law enforcement.
The truth of fact of case,
being guilty or not, compensation amount are largely evidenced by the judicial
expertise. In the past, however, there were many un-authoritative authentication
institutions. In case of¡°expertise disputes¡±, trial and law enforcement would
not know what expertise to hold as decisive evidence, and repetitive
authentications made the litigants involved had to assume redundant economic
burdens. Furthermore, the justice of law will be doubted if the expertise
conclusions are different. To supervise, administer and coordinate the judicial
expertise work, Shanghai Judicial Expertise Working Committee, the first
judicial expertise administration institution in China, was set up five years
ago, and the authoritative judicial expertise institution¡ªShanghai Judicial
Expertise Center was set up as well simultaneously. Legislative Affairs Office
of Shanghai Municipality, the Politics and Law Committee of the Municipal
Committee of the CPC, Shanghai Bureau of Public Security, Shanghai People¡¯s
Procuratorate, Shanghai Superior People's Court, Shanghai Municipal Bureau of
Justice, Shanghai Health Bureau, and Shanghai Finance Bureau are members of the
Shanghai Judicial Expertise Working Committee. The innovation in judicial
expertise administration system not only promotes the healthy and normative
development of the judicial expertise but also makes the formation of the
judicial expertise experts base come true.
Those 144 experts listed in
the judicial expertise experts base have been verified and reviewed by the
members of the Shanghai Judicial Expertise Working Committee or the affiliated
industries. They are senior experts in their scientific fields not only with
advanced technical titles but also with excellent professional skills and
ethics.
According to our sources,
those¡°Watsons of different sciences¡±had completed expertise work for around 660
cases in total under the doctrines of objectiveness, science, independence and
fairness. In their review of expertise, the case number overruling the previous
expertise conclusion has declined from 45% to the present 25% odd. Their efforts
prevent misjudged or unjust cases and give a scientific and objective support to
handling cases by the judicial authorities in a just and timely manner. In case
of gross, difficult and foreign-elements involved cases, their initial expertise
is decisive without any doubt.
The establishment of Shanghai
Judicial Expertise Center and Judicial Expertise Working Committee avoids the
possible issues in the judicial expertise work seen in the past. Where the
litigants concerned dissent from the conclusion by the initial expertise
institution, he can resort to this effective review and disposal system now,
which can reduce the situations that different expertise conclusions lead to
fail to make judgment for a long time. At present, twice authentication or less
is required for a case in Shanghai, which lighten the economic burden of the
litigants. The review of expertise by experts functions as model in Shanghai¡¯s
judicial expertise work, and enhances the quality of expertise by the initial
judicial expertise institutions in Shanghai as well.